HAYS v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. et al

Defendant: THE FORD FIRM, PLLC and WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Plaintiff: DAVID E. HAYS
Case Number: 1:2013cv00102
Filed: February 4, 2013
Court: North Carolina Middle District Court
Office: NCMD Office
County: Guilford
Presiding Judge: CATHERINE C. EAGLES
Referring Judge: JOE L. WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HAYS v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE FORD FIRM, PLLC
Represented By: TAYLOR TYSON HAYWOOD
Represented By: JOHN TABB BENJAMIN, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Represented By: TAYLOR TYSON HAYWOOD
Represented By: JOHN TABB BENJAMIN, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID E. HAYS
Represented By: DAVID W. MCDONALD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.