BRADY v. USA
Petitioner: JEFFREY ALLEN BRADY
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 1:2013cv00310
Filed: April 3, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Presiding Judge: JOE L. WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION, signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 4/14/2015. RECOMMENDED that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 4 ) be granted, that the Petition (Docket Entry 1 ) be denied, and that this action be dismissed without issuance of a certificate of appealability. (Butler, Carol)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRADY v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JEFFREY ALLEN BRADY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?