BASF AGRO B.V., ARNHEM (NL), ZURICH BRANCH v. MAKHTESHIM AGAN OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al
BASF AGRO B.V., ARNHEM (NL), ZURICH BRANCH |
MAKHTESHIM AGAN OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., CONTROL SOLUTIONS INC. and DO IT YOURSELF PEST CONTROL, INC. |
1:2013cv00422 |
May 24, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
XX US, Outside State |
L. PATRICK AULD |
WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR. on 07/27/2015. ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 25 ) is DEFERRED to summary judgment or trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Pro cedure 12(i). Defendants should submit their answer or otherwise respond within 14 days of the entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. FURTHER that the parties are to submit a joint proposed schedule for discovery for this action in conj unction with their schedule for discovery on remedies for Defendants' violation of the Consent Judgment as found in the contempt proceeding (1:14MC8). This discovery schedule should be filed with the court no later than August 21, 2015. FURTHER that the parties shall appear before this court for a discovery conference on September 17, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 1.(Taylor, Abby) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.