BUTLER et al v. BUTLER et al
VINCENT A. BUTLER and KATHARINE B. DILLON |
THERESA M. BUTLER, DAVID R. GUIN, PATRICIA B. GUIN and REGINA B. SRIRAMAN |
JOAN M. PATE |
1:2013cv00424 |
May 28, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Moore |
WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
JOE L. WEBSTER |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR. on 5/18/2016. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs Motion to Alter or Amend September 25, 2015 Judgment (Doc. 62 ) is DENIED.(Daniel, J) |
Filing 60 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 9/25/2015; that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 39 ) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER that Plaintiffs' Mo tion to Strike or Exclude Unauthenticated Exhibits to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 46 ) is DENIED IN PART in that this court took judicial notice of state court documents and GRANTED IN PART in that this court did not use the remaining documents in its deliberations. FURTHER that pursuant to this court's June 9, 2014 hearing, Plaintiffs' Revised Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 50 ) is DENIED. A judgment consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order will be entered contemporaneously herewith. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.