LONG, III v. COLVIN
| JOHN C. LONG, III |
| CAROLYN W. COLVIN |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2013cv00659 |
| August 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Caswell |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN JR., on 04/14/2015. IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 16 is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED That Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment reversing or modifying the deci sion of the Commissioner or remanding the cause for rehearing 12 is DENIED. Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings 14 is GRANTED, and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (Coyne, Michelle)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 03/24/2015. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be affirmed and that Plaintiff&# 039;s Motion for a Judgment Reversing or Modifying the Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, or Remanding the Cause for Rehearing 12 be DENIED, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 14 be GRANTED, and that this action be DISMISSED with prejudice. (Coyne, Michelle)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
