JEFFREYS v. DDR-SAU DURHAM PATTERSON, LLC
KENNETH JEFFREYS |
DDR-SAU DURHAM PATTERSON, LLC |
1:2013cv00844 |
September 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Durham |
L PATRICK AULD |
LORETTA C BIGGS |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by KENNETH JEFFREYS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DANIELS, WALTER) |
Case Reassigned to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS. CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN JR. no longer assigned to the case. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-00718-WO-LPA et al.(Powell, Gloria) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal of case without Prejudice by KENNETH JEFFREYS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DANIELS, WALTER) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing: Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing set for 1/27/2014 09:30 AM in Greensboro Courtroom #1A before MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Garrett, Kim) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by DDR-SAU DURHAM PATTERSON, LLC. (DERRICK, PAUL) |
Filing 6 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by DDR-SAU DURHAM PATTERSON, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(DERRICK, PAUL) |
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for DDR-SAU DURHAM PATTERSON, LLC. Answer due by 11/29/2013.Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 11/14/2013. (Brubaker, John) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by DDR-SAU DURHAM PATTERSON, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(DERRICK, PAUL) Modified on 10/31/2013 (Brubaker, John). |
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for DDR-SAU DURHAM PATTERSON, LLC. Answer due by 11/14/2013. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 10/31/2013. (Brubaker, John) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by KENNETH JEFFREYS as to DDR-SAU DURHAM PATTERSON, LLC served on 10/10/2013, answer due 10/31/2013. (DANIELS, WALTER) |
Filing 3 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Garland, Leah) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to DDR-SAU DURHAM PATTERSON, LLC. (Garland, Leah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DDR-SAU DURHAM PATTERSON, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-1383589.), filed by KENNETH JEFFREYS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DANIELS, WALTER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: JEFFREYS v. DDR-SAU DURHAM PATTERSON, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: KENNETH JEFFREYS | |
Represented By: | WALTER E. DANIELS, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DDR-SAU DURHAM PATTERSON, LLC | |
Represented By: | PAUL H. DERRICK |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.