ESPINOZA et al v. MEX-AM CAFE LLC et al
Plaintiff: FRANCISCO ESPINOZA and LAURA PEREZ
Defendant: MEX-AM CAFE LLC and ROBERTO GALVAN
All_defendants: Jennifer L. Reutter
Case Number: 1:2014cv00030
Filed: January 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Alamance
Presiding Judge: L. PATRICK AULD
Presiding Judge: N. C. TILLEY
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR on 9/15/2015, that for the reasons set forth above, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 6 ) is DENIED AS MOOT, Defendants' Motion to Conduct Discovery Pursuant to Rule 56(d) (Doc. # 25 ) is DENIED AS MOOT, and Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Paragraph Five of Defendant Galvan's Declaration Regarding Plaintiff Espinoza's Citizenship (Doc. # 34 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendants ' Counterclaim and Third Party Complaint (Doc. # 14 ) is DENIED, Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses in Defendants' Answer (Doc. # 16 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED PART, Defendants' Motion to Strike (Doc. # 29 ) is GRANTED, Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend to File Second Amended Complaint (Doc. # 48 ) is DENIED, and Defendants' Motion to Strike (Doc. # 52 ) is DENIED. FURTHER that Defendants may, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, file an Amended Answer that amends their affirmative defenses in accordance with this Order. FURTHER that Plaintiffs may, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, file a Second Amended Complaint adding a cause of action for retaliation resulting from Defendants alleged threats ofcriminal prosecution and jail time made during settlement negotiations. (Butler, Carol)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ESPINOZA et al v. MEX-AM CAFE LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FRANCISCO ESPINOZA
Represented By: GILDA A. HERNANDEZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LAURA PEREZ
Represented By: GILDA A. HERNANDEZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MEX-AM CAFE LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERTO GALVAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
All_defendants: Jennifer L. Reutter
Represented By: JENNIFER L. REUTTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?