LUNA-REYES v. RFI CONSTRUCTION, LLC

LUNA-REYES v. RFI CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Plaintiff:	JOAQUIN LUNA-REYES
Defendant:	RFI CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Case Number:	1:2014cv00235
Filed:	March 20, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Durham
Presiding Judge:	JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE
Presiding Judge:	THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Nature of Suit:	Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 201
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 1, 2015	Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 6/1/2015, that the motion of Defendants RFI Construction and Rupert Burrows to dismiss the second amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 29 ) is DENIED. (Daniel, J)
November 3, 2014	Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 11/3/2014; that (1) Luna-Reyes' motion to file a surreply brief (Doc. 24 ) is DENIED, (2) RFI Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) (Doc. 14 ) is DENIED , (3) RFI Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 14 ) is treated as one for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e) and GRANTED, and (4) that Plaintiff Lunas-Reyes shall submit a more definite statement, specifying whi ch claims are brought against which particular Defendant and under which basis of coverage, within thirty days of this Order. Plaintiff's failure to timely file a more definite statement will render the complaint subject to dismissal without prejudice without further notice. (Sheets, Jamie)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 1, 2015

Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 6/1/2015, that the motion of Defendants RFI Construction and Rupert Burrows to dismiss the second amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 29 ) is DENIED. (Daniel, J)

November 3, 2014

Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 11/3/2014; that (1) Luna-Reyes' motion to file a surreply brief (Doc. 24 ) is DENIED, (2) RFI Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) (Doc. 14 ) is DENIED , (3) RFI Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 14 ) is treated as one for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e) and GRANTED, and (4) that Plaintiff Lunas-Reyes shall submit a more definite statement, specifying whi ch claims are brought against which particular Defendant and under which basis of coverage, within thirty days of this Order. Plaintiff's failure to timely file a more definite statement will render the complaint subject to dismissal without prejudice without further notice. (Sheets, Jamie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LUNA-REYES v. RFI CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOAQUIN LUNA-REYES
Represented By:	JIMMY DEREK BRAZIEL
Represented By:	GILDA A. HERNANDEZ
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: RFI CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?