UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PLUMMER et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| CHARLES W. PLUMMER, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MECHANICS AND FARMERS BANK and J. RUFUS FARRIOR |
| 1:2014cv00420 |
| May 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Guilford |
| UNASSIGNED |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 08/17/2015; that Defendant Plummer is indebted to Plaintiff for assessed and unpaid Federal income tax liabilities for the taxable years 1999 to 2011, inclusive, in the total amo unt of $1,888,831.98, as of May 16, 2014, plus further interest and statutory additions thereon as provided by law. Interest shall accrue daily at the rate provided by 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621, and 6622, until paid in full. FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6321, Plaintiff has valid Federal tax liens on all of Defendant Plummer's real and personal property, including the Ragsdale Property. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may foreclose on the Ragsdale Property and sell it to offset Defendant Plummer's tax liabilities, with such subject to Defendant MFB's deed of trust. (Garland, Leah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
