BELCHER v. W.C. ENGLISH INC.

BELCHER v. W.C. ENGLISH INC.

Plaintiff:	CONNIE DEAN BELCHER
Defendant:	W.C. ENGLISH INC.
Case Number:	1:2014cv00428
Filed:	May 27, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Rockingham
Presiding Judge:	L. PATRICK AULD
Presiding Judge:	THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Nature of Suit:	Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 27, 2015	Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 07/27/2015, that Plaintiff's Motion that His Amended Complaint Be Substituted for His Original Complaint (ECF No. 19 ), Plaintiff's Motion for Amendment to Order Ap proving Joint Rule 26(f) Report for Extension of Time for Amending Complaint (ECF No. 23 ), and Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time within Which to File a Motion to Substitute Amended Complaint for Original Complaint (ECF No. 23 ) are < b>DENIED. FURTHER that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27 ) is GRANTED IN PART, in that the Court grants summary judgment in favor of WCE, and DENIED IN PART, in that the Court denies WCE's requ est for attorney's fees and costs. FURTHER that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 16 ) and Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time within Which to File a Response to Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 23 ) are DENIED AS MOOT.(Taylor, Abby)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 27, 2015

Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 07/27/2015, that Plaintiff's Motion that His Amended Complaint Be Substituted for His Original Complaint (ECF No. 19 ), Plaintiff's Motion for Amendment to Order Ap proving Joint Rule 26(f) Report for Extension of Time for Amending Complaint (ECF No. 23 ), and Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time within Which to File a Motion to Substitute Amended Complaint for Original Complaint (ECF No. 23 ) are < b>DENIED. FURTHER that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27 ) is GRANTED IN PART, in that the Court grants summary judgment in favor of WCE, and DENIED IN PART, in that the Court denies WCE's requ est for attorney's fees and costs. FURTHER that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 16 ) and Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time within Which to File a Response to Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 23 ) are DENIED AS MOOT.(Taylor, Abby)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BELCHER v. W.C. ENGLISH INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: CONNIE DEAN BELCHER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: W.C. ENGLISH INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?