BROWN v. JOHNSON et al
| MICHAEL W. BROWN |
| CATHY H. JOHNSON and MONTA DAVIS OLIVER |
| 1:2014cv00432 |
| May 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Yadkin |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| N. C. TILLEY |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR on 07/31/2015, that the Court adopts the Recommendation, and that this action be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. # 4 ) be denied as moot. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 08/12/2014; that Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit/Declaration in Support (Docke t Entry 1 ) is GRANTED FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF ALLOWING THE COURT TO CONSIDER A RECOMMENDATION OF DISMISSAL. RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2)(B)(ii). FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Docket Entry 4 ) be denied as moot. (Garland, Leah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
