BOLDER v. MERRITT
Plaintiff: WILLIE J. BOLDER
Defendant: PATRICK T. MERRITT, JR.
Case Number: 1:2014cv00628
Filed: July 25, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Cabarrus
Presiding Judge: THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Presiding Judge: JOE L. WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 11/06/2017, that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 37 ) be GRANTED.(Taylor, Abby)
October 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 10/11/2016 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, that Plaintiff's claim shall not be dismissed at this time pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and further proceedings are permitted to proceed in this matter. (Garland, Leah)
June 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 06/11/2015, that the court has reviewed and hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10 ) is GRANTED IN PART, to the extent Defendant seeks abstention of this case based upon the Younger doctrine. 401 U.S. 37 (1971). FURTHER that this action is STAYED pending the resolution of the state court's criminal proceedings. (Taylor, Abby)
May 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 05/15/2015. For the reasons stated herein, abstention is proper in this matter. However, the Court should stay the matter rather than dismiss this case with prejudice. RECOMMENDED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry 10 ) be GRANTED IN PART, to the extent Defendant seeks abstention of this case based upon the Younger doctrine. FURTHER that this case be STAYED pending the resolution of the state court's criminal proceedings.(Taylor, Abby)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOLDER v. MERRITT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIE J. BOLDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PATRICK T. MERRITT, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?