PRECISION FABRICS GROUP, INC. v. TIETEX INTERNATIONAL, LTD.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit North Carolina Middle District PRECISION FABRICS GROUP, INC. v. TIETEX INTERNATIONAL, LTD.

PRECISION FABRICS GROUP, INC. v. TIETEX INTERNATIONAL, LTD.

Plaintiff:	PRECISION FABRICS GROUP, INC.
Defendant:	TIETEX INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
Case Number:	1:2014cv00650
Filed:	August 4, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Alamance
Presiding Judge:	L. PATRICK AULD
Presiding Judge:	THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 10, 2015	Filing 60 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 8/10/2015, that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Docket Entry 60 ) is DENIED IN PART AS MOOT, in that, Plaintiff has shown no entitlement to an order compelling further di scovery from Defendant. FURTHER that, on or before August 24, 2015, Plaintiff either 1) shall file a Notice with the Court renouncing any expense-shifting; or 2) shall serve Defendant with a statement setting out the reasonable expenses, inclu ding attorney's fees, Plaintiff incurred in making the instant Motion. Failure by Plaintiff to comply with this Order will result in denial of any expense-shifting. FURTHER that, if Plaintiff timely serves such a statement of reasonable e xpenses, Defendant shall file, on or before September 8, 2015, either: 1) a Notice indicating its and/or its counsel's agreement to pay the claimed expenses; or 2) a Memorandum of no more than ten pages setting out Defendant's argument as t o why the Court should not require Defendant and/or its counsel to pay such expenses (including any argument challenging the reasonableness of such expenses), along with a certification that, since the date of this Order, Defendant has attempted to c onfer in good faith with Plaintiff about resolution of the issue of expense-shifting. Failure by Defendant to comply with this Order will result in the Court ordering, upon the filing of a Notice by Plaintiff of its reasonable expenses as contained i n the statement served upon Defendant, the payment of such expenses by Defendant. FURTHER that, on or before September 29, 2015, Plaintiff shall file a Response of no more than ten pages to any Memorandum timely filed by Defendant. Failure by Plaintiff to comply with this Order will result in denial of any expense-shifting. FURTHER that, on or before October 6, 2015, Defendant may file a Reply of no more than five pages to any Response timely filed by Plaintiff. FURTHER that, upon completion of the foregoing briefing or the time for such briefing, the Clerk shall refer this matter back to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for further action. (Daniel, J)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 10, 2015

Filing 60 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 8/10/2015, that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Docket Entry 60 ) is DENIED IN PART AS MOOT, in that, Plaintiff has shown no entitlement to an order compelling further di scovery from Defendant. FURTHER that, on or before August 24, 2015, Plaintiff either 1) shall file a Notice with the Court renouncing any expense-shifting; or 2) shall serve Defendant with a statement setting out the reasonable expenses, inclu ding attorney's fees, Plaintiff incurred in making the instant Motion. Failure by Plaintiff to comply with this Order will result in denial of any expense-shifting. FURTHER that, if Plaintiff timely serves such a statement of reasonable e xpenses, Defendant shall file, on or before September 8, 2015, either: 1) a Notice indicating its and/or its counsel's agreement to pay the claimed expenses; or 2) a Memorandum of no more than ten pages setting out Defendant's argument as t o why the Court should not require Defendant and/or its counsel to pay such expenses (including any argument challenging the reasonableness of such expenses), along with a certification that, since the date of this Order, Defendant has attempted to c onfer in good faith with Plaintiff about resolution of the issue of expense-shifting. Failure by Defendant to comply with this Order will result in the Court ordering, upon the filing of a Notice by Plaintiff of its reasonable expenses as contained i n the statement served upon Defendant, the payment of such expenses by Defendant. FURTHER that, on or before September 29, 2015, Plaintiff shall file a Response of no more than ten pages to any Memorandum timely filed by Defendant. Failure by Plaintiff to comply with this Order will result in denial of any expense-shifting. FURTHER that, on or before October 6, 2015, Defendant may file a Reply of no more than five pages to any Response timely filed by Plaintiff. FURTHER that, upon completion of the foregoing briefing or the time for such briefing, the Clerk shall refer this matter back to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for further action. (Daniel, J)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PRECISION FABRICS GROUP, INC. v. TIETEX INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: PRECISION FABRICS GROUP, INC.
Represented By:	RICHARD A. COUGHLIN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: TIETEX INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
Represented By:	MARK ANDREW STAFFORD
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?