WOODS et al v. CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
| MICHAEL WOODS, RAMONA WOODS and BNT AD AGENCY, LLC |
| CITY OF GREENSBORO, TONY WILKINS, NANCY HOFFMAN, NANCY VAUGHAN, ZACK MATHENY, MARIKAY ABUZUAITER and T. DIANNE BELLAMY-SMALL |
| 1:2014cv00767 |
| September 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Guilford |
| UNASSIGNED |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 09/18/2019. For the foregoing reasons, this court finds that Defendant's motion for summary judgment should be granted. ORDERED that Defend ant's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 71 ), is GRANTED. FURTHER that Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Howard Rockness, (Doc. 69 ), is DENIED AS MOOT. A judgment in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion and Order will be entered contemporaneously herewith.(Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 12/11/2015. For the reasons set forth herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 10 , 12 ) are GRANTED and Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Doc. 5 ) is DISMISSED.A judgment consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order will be entered contemporaneously herewith.(Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
