BAKER v. DURHAM COUNTY S.W.A.T. TEAM et al
| BRIAN JOSHUA BAKER |
| DURHAM COUNTY S.W.A.T. TEAM and D. E. FRANKLIN |
| 1:2014cv00878 |
| October 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Alamance |
| WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
| JOE L. WEBSTER |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 02/11/2019, that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 122 ) is ADOPTED. FURTHER that Defendant City of Durham's Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default (Doc. 110 ) is GRANTED.(Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 09/28/2018, that the Magistrate Judge's orders (Text Order dated June 11, 2018, and Text Order dated July 13, 2018) are hereby AFFIRMED and that Plaintiff's motion to extend time, (Doc. 83 ), and Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery, (Doc. 85 ), are DENIED. FURTHER that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 104 ), is ADOPTED. FURTHER that Defendant Rosencrans' motion to dis miss for failure to state a claim, (Doc. 77 ), and motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 93 ), are GRANTED and that Plaintiff's claims as to Defendant Rosencrans are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to set the remaining c laims as to Defendants JOSE LUIS LOPEZ, SR., and DAVID TODD ROSE for trial. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to set a date, following the trial of Jose Luis Lopez, Sr., and David Todd Rose, for a hearing as to the entry of a DEFAULT JUDGMENT as to Defendant CITY OF DURHAM as a result of the Magistrate Judge's ENTRY OF DEFAULT by Text Order dated June 11, 2018. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 07/13/2018, that Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Docket Entry 77 ) be GRANTEDand Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 93 ) be GRANTED.(Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 07/11/2016, that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 46 ) is ADOPTED. FURTHER that Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Doc. 42 ) is DENIED , that Defendants' Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Doc. 43 ) is GRANTED, and that the Partial Entry of Default as to Defendants Durham S.E.T., City of Durham, and Durham Police Department (Doc. 41) is hereby SET ASIDE.1 (Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 05/05/2016. For the reasons stated herein, IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Jud gment (Docket Entry 42 ) be DENIED. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Defendants' Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default and in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Docket Entry 43 ) be GRANTED.(Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
