KEENER v. THE UNIVERSAL COMPANIES, INC. F/K/A UNIVERSAL FOREST PRODUCTS, INC. et al
| DONNA A KEENER |
| THE UNIVERSAL COMPANIES, INC. F/K/A UNIVERSAL FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., UFP EASTERN DIVISION, INC. F/K/A UNIVERSAL FOREST PRODUCTS EASTERN COMPANY, INC., UFP SALISBURY, LLC and UNIVERSAL FOREST PRODUCTS, INC. |
| 1:2014cv00982 |
| November 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Rowan |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 754 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 09/01/2015; that Defendants' Renewed Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 18 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's Fifth Claim for Relie f based on Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress is DISMISSED and the court will not allow Plaintiff to proceed on the theories of sexual harassment/hostile work environment, failure to promote, or pay discrimination in her First Clai m for Relief under Title VII. All other requested forms of relief within Defendants' Renewed Partial Motion to Dismiss are DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants' Reply (Doc. 32 ) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' request to modify the case caption is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Garland, Leah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
