TREECE v. COLVIN
| CHARLES A. TREECE |
| CAROLYN W. COLVIN |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2014cv01077 |
| December 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Cabarrus |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| N. C. TILLEY |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR on 03/25/2016. This Court, therefore, adopts the Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in its entirety. ORDERED that the Commissioner's Motion for Firs t Extension of Time [Doc. # 14 is DENIED AS MOOT, that Mr. Treece's Motions for Default Judgment [Docs. # 11 , 12 , 15 are DENIED, and that the Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. # 18 is GRANTED. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 01/19/2016; that the Commissioner's Motion for First Extension of Time (Docket Entry 14 ) be denied as moot. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's motions for default judgment (Docket Entries 11 , 12 , 15 ) be denied. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 18 ) be granted. (Garland, Leah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
