ABUNDEZ v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

ABUNDEZ v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Petitioner:	JOSE J. ABUNDEZ
Respondent:	STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case Number:	1:2015cv00062
Filed:	January 16, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Hoke
Presiding Judge:	JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE
Presiding Judge:	THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 22, 2015	Filing 6 ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 06/22/2015 affirming and adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, that, to the extent Petitioner requests appointment of counsel, that request is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that this action is f iled, but then dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition which corrects the defects of the current Petition. Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. (Garland, Leah)
May 18, 2015	Filing 3 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 05/18/2015, that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instruct ed to send Petitioner § 2254 forms, instructions, and a current application to proceed in forma pauperis. RECOMMENDED that this action be filed, but then dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition which corrects the defects of the current Petition.(Taylor, Abby)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 22, 2015

Filing 6 ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 06/22/2015 affirming and adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, that, to the extent Petitioner requests appointment of counsel, that request is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that this action is f iled, but then dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition which corrects the defects of the current Petition. Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. (Garland, Leah)

May 18, 2015

Filing 3 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 05/18/2015, that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instruct ed to send Petitioner § 2254 forms, instructions, and a current application to proceed in forma pauperis. RECOMMENDED that this action be filed, but then dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition which corrects the defects of the current Petition.(Taylor, Abby)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ABUNDEZ v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSE J. ABUNDEZ
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?