WOLTZ v. Whitley
Petitioner: HOWELL WAY WOLTZ
Respondent: BRADLEY G. WHITLEY
Case Number: 1:2015cv00082
Filed: January 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Davie
Presiding Judge: THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Presiding Judge: JOE L. WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 02/16/2016 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation; that Petitioner's Motion for Sanctions or Entry of Default (Doc. 3 ) is DENIED as moot. (Garland, Leah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WOLTZ v. Whitley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: HOWELL WAY WOLTZ
Represented By: RANDOLPH M. JAMES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BRADLEY G. WHITLEY
Represented By: ANGELA HEWLETT MILLER(Designation United States Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?