SANTIAGO v. SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS et al
Plaintiff: OSEAS SANTIAGO, JR.
Defendant: SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, MALDONADO and NURSE JESSICA
Case Number: 1:2015cv00589
Filed: July 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Hoke
Presiding Judge: L. PATRICK AULD
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM L. OSTEEN
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 08/19/2016, that the Motion to Compel (Docket Entry 34 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: on or before September 2, 2016, Defendants shall pro duce to Plaintiff (i) Plaintiff's complete medical records for the period of his incarceration, and (ii) any rules, policies, or regulations for the medical treatment of Hoke County Detention Center inmates that are relevant to Plaintiff's claim or any defense that Defendants may offer. (Taylor, Abby)
February 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 02/09/2016. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Set Aside Default 18 is GRANTED IN PART in that the Entry of Default 12 against Defendant Jessica and Defendant Maldonado is SET ASIDE, but the Motion to Set Aside Default is otherwise DEEMED MOOT. FURTHER that Defendant Maldonado shall have through and including March 1, 2016, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. FURT HER that on or before March 1. 2016, SHP shall file under seal, its last known address for Defendant Jessica. FURTHER that the Clerk shall prepare a summons with Defendant Jessica's last known address as provided by SHP and that the United States Marshals Service shall serve that summons and Complaint on Defendant Jessica. The Clerk shall publicly docket only a redacted version of the Summons and/or Affidavit of Service as to Defendant Jessica. (Coyne, Michelle)
December 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction 7 be DENIED. (Coyne, Michelle)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SANTIAGO v. SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OSEAS SANTIAGO, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MALDONADO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NURSE JESSICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?