GOVAN v. SOLOMON
Petitioner: MARK DWAYNE GOVAN
Respondent: GEORGE T. SOLOMON
Case Number: 1:2016cv00670
Filed: June 14, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: L. PATRICK AULD
Presiding Judge: LORETTA C. BIGGS
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATIONsigned by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 2/1/2017. RECOMMENDED that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 4 ) be granted, that the Petition (Docket Entry 1 ) be denied, and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action. (Butler, Carol)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GOVAN v. SOLOMON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MARK DWAYNE GOVAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: GEORGE T. SOLOMON
Represented By: CLARENCE JOE DELFORGE, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?