SYDELL v. LIFEMED USA, INC. et al
| KRYSTINN L. SYDELL |
| LIFEMED USA, INC., THE LIFEMED GROUP, INC. and MURRAY R. MAYNARD |
| 1:2016cv01143 |
| September 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Orange |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| LORETTA C. BIGGS |
| Other Contract |
| Diversity |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 3/30/2019; that 35 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Final Judgment is GRANTED. The Court hereby enters a Default Judgment in favor of Plaintiff, Krystinn L. Sydell, and against each Defendant, jointly and severally, in the total amount of $424,590.50, plus prejudgment interest on the sum of $126,939.35 at the rate of 8% per annum from February 17, 2016 until that amount of the judgment has been satisfied. (Samuel-Priestley, Tina)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 3/29/2019; that 35 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED, and the Clerk of Court is directed to enter Default Judgment i n favor of Plaintiff, Krystinn L. Sydell, and against each Defendant, jointly and severally, in the total amount of $424,590.50, plus prejudgment interest on the sum of $126,939.35 at the rate of 8% per annum from February 17, 2016 until that amount of the judgment has been satisfied.(Samuel-Priestley, Tina)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 10/27/2017; that Attorney Kevin Bradley Cartledge's Motion to Withdraw (Docket Entry 16 ) is GRANTED as to Defendant Maynard and GRANTED IN PART as to Corporate Defendants, in that current counsel shall remain in the case for the limited purpose of accepting service of papers for (and forwarding them on to) Corporate Defendants, unless/until new counsel appears for Corporate Defendants. Counsel shall provide the Clerk with an address for addition to the Docket as the place for service upon Defendant Maynard, who now proceeds pro se. FURTHER that Corporate Defendants shall cause new counsel to file a notice of appearance on their behalf by November 10, 2017. FURTHER th at Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Docket Entry 18 ) is GRANTED. On or before November 10, 2017, Defendants shall serve full and complete responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents. FURTHER that, on or before November 10, 2017, Plaintiff shall file a notice setting out the reasonable expenses she incurred in litigating the Motion to Compel. FURTHER that, if Plaintiff timely files a notice setting forth the reasonable expenses she incur red in litigating the Motion to Compel, Defendants shall file, on or before November 24, 2017, EITHER a memorandum of no more than three pages (excluding attachments) contesting the reasonableness of the expenses claimed (along with a certificate tha t Defendants have conferred in good faith with Plaintiff about such matters), OR a notice agreeing to pay the claimed expenses. FURTHER that, if Defendants timely file a memorandum contesting the reasonableness of the claimed expenses, Plaintiff shal l file, on or before December 8, 2017, a memorandum of no more than three pages (excluding attachments) responding to Defendants' memorandum. FURTHER that, if Plaintiff timely files such a response memorandum, Defendants may file, on or before December 15, 2017, a reply of no more than two pages (excluding attachments). (Sheets, Jamie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
