MCCLEAN v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
COLLEEN MCCLEAN |
DUKE UNIVERSITY, SHEILA BRODERICK and STEVEN THOMAS BISHOP |
1:2017cv00603 |
June 29, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Durham |
JOE L. WEBSTER |
WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
Civil Rights: Education |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 3/25/2019; that Defendant Duke University's motion to dismiss, (Doc. 29 ), is GRANTED. FURTHER that Defendant Sheila Broderick's motion to dismiss, (Doc. 26 ), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as set forth herein, in that the motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims for violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 99D1 et seq., violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75 -1 et seq., negligent infliction of emotional distress, and negligence, and DENIED as to Plaintiff's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. FURTHER that Defendant Steven Thomas Bishop's motion to dismiss, (Doc . 31 ), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as set forth herein, in that the motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims for violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 99D1 et seq., negligent infliction of emotional distress, and negligence, and DENIED as to Plaintiff's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.