TAPP-EL v. COOPER
| MICHAEL TAPP-EL |
| ROY COOPER |
| 1:2019cv00131 |
| January 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by MICHAEL TAPP-EL. Responses due by 4/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope - Front and Back) (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 8 Roseboro Letter - Right to Respond to #6 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Daniel, J) |
| Filing 7 Supporting BRIEF re #6 MOTION for Summary Judgment , #5 Response to Habeas Petition by Respondent ROY COOPER filed by ROY COOPER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Detailed List of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1- State v. Tapp, 2000 N.C. App. LEXIS 78 (2000) (unpublished "no error" opinion), #3 Exhibit 2- Record on appeal, #4 Exhibit 3- Petitioners appellate brief filed in NCCOA, #5 Exhibit 4- States appellate brief filed in NCCOA, #6 Exhibit 5- MAR, #7 Exhibit 6- Judge Gottliebs 29 August 2018 order denying MAR, #8 Exhibit 7- Certiorari petition filed in NCCOA, #9 Exhibit 8- 9 October 2018 order of NCCOA denying certiorari)(DELFORGE, CLARENCE) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment by ROY COOPER. Response to Motion due by 4/1/2019 (DELFORGE, CLARENCE) |
| Filing 5 Answer RESPONSE to #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by ROY COOPER. (DELFORGE, CLARENCE) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO FILE AND REQUIRING ANSWER FROM RESPONDENT as to MICHAEL TAPP-EL, signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 1/31/2019, that Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Respondent shall file an answer with this Court, pursuant to Rules 4 and 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, within 40 days of the issue of this Order. (Butler, Carol)
|
| Answer updated deadline for ROY COOPER to 3/12/2019. (Butler, Carol) |
| CASE REFERRED for Screening (Butler, Carol) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT & DECLARATION in Support of Initial Habeas Corpus Petition/Application for Preservation of all Rights Pursuant to Rules 60(b), 103(a)(1) Evidence, inter alia(s), re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by MICHAEL TAPP-EL. (Butler, Carol) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MICHAEL TAPP-EL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(Butler, Carol) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by MICHAEL TAPP-EL. (Butler, Carol) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TAPP-EL v. COOPER | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MICHAEL TAPP-EL | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ROY COOPER | |
| Represented By: | CLARENCE JOE DELFORGE, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
