Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Propak Logistics, Inc.
| Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Propak Logistics, Inc. |
| 1:2009cv00311 |
| August 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Cleveland |
| Dennis Howell |
| Lacy Thornburg |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 ra Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER denying 61 Motion to Modify the Record. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 11/7/13. (ejb)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 03/26/13. (emw)
|
|
Filing
42
JUDGMENT in favor of Propak Logistics, Inc. against Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 08/06/12. (emw)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER (1) On or before 45 days from entry of this Order, EEOC shall produce to Deft any additional non-privileged documents contained within admin. record relevant to issue of laches; (2) During 45 day period following entry o f this Order, parties may engage in limited discovery related solely to issue of prejudice. Such discovery shall be limited to (a) deposition of Leah Hamilton and (b) a deposition pursuant to FRCvP 30(b)(6); (3) On or before 60 days from entry of thi s Order, Deft shall file motion for summary judgment based solely on issue of laches, if it intends to continue to assert it is entitled to such. If it files such motion, EEOC may file a response within 15 days of its filing; (4) PTO & CMP will be entered, if necessary, at such time as ruling on motion for summary judgment has been made. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 8/22/11. (ejb)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDERED that on or before fifteen (15) days from entry of this Order, the Plaintiff may file response not to exceed five (5) double-spaced pages explaining why discovery is necessary on the issue of laches. The Defendant may t hen file reply not to exceed five (5) double-spaced pages to that response on or before fifteen (15) days from service thereof. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fifteen (15) days from the entry of this Order, the Plaintiff shall file the administrat ive and/or investigatory record with the Court or shall file explanation not to exceed two (2) double-spaced pages why the same may not be so filed, re 17 Notice (Other), 18 Notice (Other). Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 09/03/2010. (thh)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER denying 4 Motion to Dismiss; approving 11 Memorandum and Recommendations. At such time as the parties reach agreement or the Defendant makes its election, a scheduling order will issue. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on August 6, 2010. (jhg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Propak Logistics, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
| Represented By: | Randall Derek Huggins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Propak Logistics, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
