Kingsley v. Brenda and Gene Lummus Inc et al
Jessica Kingsley |
Brenda and Gene Lummus, Inc. and Gene Lummus Harley Davidson, Inc. |
1:2011cv00032 |
February 11, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Haywood |
Dennis Howell |
Martin Reidinger |
Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 JUDGMENT in favor of Brenda and Gene Lummus, Inc., Gene Lummus Harley Davidson, Inc., TRL Motor Sports, LLC f/k/a Ghost Town Harley Davidson against Jessica Kingsley. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 5/25/2012. (rap) |
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER denying 32 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 3/6/12. (nll) |
Filing 29 ORDER re 26 Amended Complaint: that on or before December 2, 2011, the defendant TRL Motor Sports, LLC shall file a response disclosing the names and citizenships, if any, of all the constituent members or partners of the above referenced LLC, and, for any such constituent member or partner that are limited liability companies or partnerships, to identify the citizenships of the respective constituent members or partners until all such constituents are fully identified. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 11/17/11. (nll) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting 5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Philip C. Thompson for Jessica Kingsley. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 2/14/11. (siw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.