Esposito v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
| Joseph Esposito |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company |
| 1:2013cv00098 |
| April 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Cleveland |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A. |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION re 27 Joint MOTION to Strike is DENIED as moot. Dfts' 19 MOTION to Dismiss (or alternatively, for Judgment on the Pleadings) as to Plaintiff's Third through Sixth Causes of A ction in Amended Complaint and 22 MOTION to Dismiss and to Strike Plaintiff's Jury Demand are DENIED as moot. Dft's 19 MOTION to Dismiss as to Plaintiff's Third through Sixth Causes of Action in Amended Complain t is GRANTED. 22 MOTION to Dismiss and to Strike Plaintiff's Jury Demand is GRANTED. Wal-Mart is TERMINATED. Dft's 20 MOTION to Strike Jury Demand in Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 8/19/2014. (klb)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER denying 10 Motion to Dismiss; denying 12 Motion to Dismiss; granting 14 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 6/12/13. (nll)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER granting 6 & 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added J. Gordon Howard and Thomas H. Lawrence for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 05/22/2013. (thh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
