Gentry v. Maggie Valley Resort Management, LLC et al
| Judith Gentry |
| Maggie Valley Resort Management, LLC, East West Partners Club Management Company, Inc. and Jay Manner |
| 1:2013cv00108 |
| April 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Haywood |
| Dennis Howell |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
209
ORDER denying 167 MOTION for Attorney Fees . Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 01/27/2015. (klb)
|
|
Filing
193
ORDER denying Pla's 177 Motion for New Trial. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 11/18/2014. (klb)
|
|
Filing
192
ORDER granting 170 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages and 188 Motion to Accept Affidavits. The 167 Motion for Attorney Fees and 169 Motion to Stay Execution are to be calendared by the Clerk. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 11/17/2014. (klb)
|
|
Filing
160
JUDGMENT in favor of Pla Judith Gentry against East West Partners Club Management Company, Inc., Jay Manner. Judgment entered in favor of Dft Maggie Valley Resort Management, LLC against Pla Judith Gentry. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 09/15/2014. (klb)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER denying 57 Motion for Summary Judgment, 61 Motion for Summary Judgment and 78 Motion to Strike. Allowing 91 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time. Parties may make such exchange of disclosures not later than the Final Pretrial Conference. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 8/11/2014. (nv)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER that the Clerk of Court schedule MVRM's 57 Motion for Summary Judgment, 61 EWPCMC, Defendant Manner's Motion for Summary Judgment, and defendants' 78 joint Motion to Strike for oral arguments at the court's next available hearing day in Asheville. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. on 6/9/2014. (khm)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 66 Motion to Seal Documents Documents 71 & 72 . Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/9/14. (ejb)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting 52 Motion to Quash the subpoena issued to Honours Group. The Court DIRECTS Honours Group that it need not respond to the subpoena and need not produce the materials requested by Plaintiff in the subpoena. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 03/11/2014. (thh)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER denying 62 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 3/10/2014. (tmg)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 38 Motion for Protective Order; granting 18 Motion for Protective Order; granting 18 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 01/09/14. (emw)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER re 38 MOTION for Protective Order . The Court DIRECTS the parties that it will hear argument on the pending motion at the previously scheduled hearing on January 6, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2 at the United States District Court Western District of North Carolina, Asheville Division, 100 Otis Street, Asheville, North Carolina. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 12/31/13. (emw)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER denying 36 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 12/23/13. (emw)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting 24 & 27 Motions to Seal Documents re 22 Sealed Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, 23 Sealed Affidavit in Opposition to Motion and 28 Sealed Reply to Response to Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 12/18/13. (ejb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
