Newell v. White et al
Jonathan James Newell |
Susan R. White, Jackie Huggins and Lynn B. Ollis |
1:2014cv00320 |
December 16, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Mitchell |
Frank D. Whitney |
Civil Rights |
Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER granting 35 Motion for Return of Property as to [19-1] and [25-1]; denying 36 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 06/26/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw) |
Filing 29 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 4/28/2015. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb) |
Filing 24 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion for Return of Exhibits. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/26/15. (Copies of Doc. Nos. 3 , [4-1], 5 & 8 , and New Civil Filing Packet mailed to Pltf as instructed.) (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb) |
Filing 20 ORDER denying 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 9 Motion for TRO/Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and granting 18 Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Original Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/24/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(khm) |
Filing 12 ORDER Plaintiff shall have twenty days from service of this order to submit the Step Three response to his grievance to show the Court that he has exhausted his administrative remedies. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/8/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.