Mountain Land Properties, Inc. et al v. Lovell et al
||Mountain Land Properties, Inc. and Diana D.
||Fred Lovell, Rodney Hickox, Lynn A. Hickox and SCBT, N.A.
||November 5, 2012
||North Carolina Western District Court
||Bryson City Office
|Nature of Suit:
||Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
|Cause of Action:
||Diversity - Notice of Removal
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 20, 2014
ORDER denying [49,50] Motions to Withdraw as Attorney; finding as moot 51 Pro Se Motion to Deny Counsel for Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 06/20/2014. (thh)
|September 11, 2014
ORDER dismissing all claims asserted by Pltf Mountain Land Properties, Inc. against all Defts; accepting Magistrate Judge's 44 Memorandum and Recommendations, and rejecting Pltfs' 45 Objections; granting in part and denying in part 25 Deft SBCT's Motion to Dismiss; granting 26 Deft Lynn Hickox's Motion to Dismiss as to all of Pltf Diana D.'s claims against her; granting 27 Deft Rodney Hickox's Motion to Dismiss as to all of Pltf Di ana D.'s claims against him; granting 28 Deft Fred Lovell's Motion to Dismiss as to all of Pltf Diana D.'s claims against him. Pltf Diana D. shall have 14 days to decide whether to participate in the Pro Se Settlement Assistance Program and return completed Notice form to the Clerk. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 9/11/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.