Mountain Land Properties, Inc. et al v. Lovell et al
| Mountain Land Properties, Inc. and Diana D. |
| Fred Lovell, Rodney Hickox, Lynn A. Hickox and SCBT, N.A. |
| 2:2012cv00084 |
| November 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Bryson City Office |
| Swain |
| Dennis Howell |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| Diversity - Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER dismissing all claims asserted by Pltf Mountain Land Properties, Inc. against all Defts; accepting Magistrate Judge's 44 Memorandum and Recommendations, and rejecting Pltfs' 45 Objections; granting in part and denying in part 25 Deft SBCT's Motion to Dismiss; granting 26 Deft Lynn Hickox's Motion to Dismiss as to all of Pltf Diana D.'s claims against her; granting 27 Deft Rodney Hickox's Motion to Dismiss as to all of Pltf Di ana D.'s claims against him; granting 28 Deft Fred Lovell's Motion to Dismiss as to all of Pltf Diana D.'s claims against him. Pltf Diana D. shall have 14 days to decide whether to participate in the Pro Se Settlement Assistance Program and return completed Notice form to the Clerk. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 9/11/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying [49,50] Motions to Withdraw as Attorney; finding as moot 51 Pro Se Motion to Deny Counsel for Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 06/20/2014. (thh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
