Zulch et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Edward Zulch and Barbara Zulch |
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation |
2:2014cv00013 |
April 28, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Bryson City Office |
Jackson |
Dennis Howell |
Martin Reidinger |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER parties shall confer before 8/27/14 as noted; pleading shall be filed on or before 9/3/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 8/13/14. (nv) |
Filing 21 ORDER canceling the hearing and conference that was previously set for 7/3/14 at 2:00 p.m. Neither counsel for the Plaintiff nor counsel for Defendant are required to appear. Re 19 Order, Set Hearings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 6/27/14. (nv) |
Filing 19 ORDER setting hearing ( Pretrial Conference set for 7/3/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 100 Otis St, Asheville, NC 28801 before Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 06/26/2014. (thh) |
Filing 16 ORDER that the parties shall conduct an attorneys' conference as soon as practicable but no later than May 23, 2014, and that the parties shall file a status report with the Court no later than May 30, 2014. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 05/08/14. (emw) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting 13 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Gregory Scott Chernack for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 5/1/14. (ejb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.