Owens v. Corpening
| Carl S. Owens |
| Hubert Corpening |
| 2:2014cv00052 |
| December 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Bryson City Office |
| Cherokee |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER: 1) Petitioner's 1 2254 motion is DENIED and petition is DISMISSED. 2) Petitioner's 2 Motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. 3) Petitioner's 3 Application for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED AS MOOT. 4) Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 12/15/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (klb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Owens v. Corpening | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Hubert Corpening | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Carl S. Owens | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
