Shropshire et al v. Pacific Cycle, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: James Michael Shropshire and Charlene Shropshire
Case Number: 3:2008cv00255
Filed: June 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Tort Product Liability Office
County: Gaston
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Frank D. Whitney
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/21/09. (dtr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shropshire et al v. Pacific Cycle, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Michael Shropshire
Represented By: Randall Joseph Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charlene Shropshire
Represented By: Randall Joseph Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?