Hurth v. Bradman-lake, Inc. et al
| Damion Hurth |
| Bradman-lake, Inc. and Bradman Lake Group |
| 3:2008cv00370 |
| August 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| Carl Horn |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:451 Employment Discrimination |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending granting 41 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Bradman Lake Group, Bradman-lake, Inc., Langley Holdings, PLC ( Objections to M&R due by 8/31/2009), ORDER granting 55 MOTION to Strike 53 Response ; denying 61 MOTION to Strike; granting 79 MOTION to Compel ; granting 88 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 8/14/2009. (tmg)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER, (Dispositive Motions due by 10/21/2009.) This matter will be set for trial with a jury for the first available civil term beginning on or after January 21, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl Horn, III on 12/10/08. (dtr)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER setting Pretrial Conference for 12/10/2008 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Carl Horn III. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl Horn, III on 11/12/2008. (klg)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting 18 Motion to Consolidate Cases. All further pleadings to be docketed to: 3:08cv370 Member Case: 3:08cv389 to be administratively closed.. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 10/15/2008. (klg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
