Zep Inc. v. Midwest Motor Supply Co. et al
| Zep Inc. |
| Midwest Motor Supply Co. and John Thomas Belk |
| 3:2009cv00005 |
| January 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Personal Property: Other Office |
| XX, Outside State |
| David Keesler |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER Consolidating Cases for Trial. All further pleadings to be docketed to: 1:08cv550. Member Case: 3:09cv5 to be administratively closed. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 03/10/2009. (thh)
|
|
Filing
48
Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 2/9/2009. (klg)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting 42 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Megan K. Ouzts for Zep Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/29/2009. (klg)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting 28 Motion to Change Venue and the case of Zep, Inc. v. Midwest Motor Supply Co. d/b/a Kimball Midwest and John Thomas Belk is RE-SEVERED and transferred to the Charlotte Division of the Western District of North Carolina with asepar ate docket number; the case of Zep, Inc. v. Midwest Motor Supply Co. d/b/a Kimball Midwest, Steven Lave, and Samuel Trantham is RETAINED in theAsheville Division of this court and shall proceed under docket number 1:08cv550;. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 01/07/09. (emw) [Transferred from North Carolina Western on 1/8/2009.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
