Berry v. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
| William Berry |
| Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc. |
| 3:2013cv00071 |
| February 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| Graham Mullen |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Stay re 8 Scheduling Order. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 11/4/2013. (eef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Berry v. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Berry | |
| Represented By: | Brett E. Dressler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jason Robert Benton |
| Represented By: | Kevin L. Chignell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
