Stafford v. Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff: Bonnie R. Stafford
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Case Number: 3:2013cv00699
Filed: December 20, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Alexander
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Conrad
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/4/2014. (eef)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stafford v. Bank of America, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By: Susan Pyle Dion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bonnie R. Stafford
Represented By: Audrey Clair Page
Represented By: Margaret (Meg) Behringer Maloney
Represented By: Tamara L. Huckert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?