Beatty-Adam v. University of Phoenix, Inc.
Kawana Beatty-Adam |
University of Phoenix, Inc. |
3:2014cv00398 |
July 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
Graham Mullen |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER granting 7 STIPULATION for Second Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. University of Phoenix, Inc. answer due 10/6/2014.. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/15/2014. (eef) |
Filing 6 ORDER Extending Time to Answer. University of Phoenix, Inc. answer due 9/15/2014. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 8/26/2014. (tmg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Beatty-Adam v. University of Phoenix, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: University of Phoenix, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kawana Beatty-Adam | |
Represented By: | Ruth M. Allen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.