Lightcast, Inc (Alabama) v. Lightcast, Inc (Nevada) et al
| Lightcast, Inc (Alabama) |
| Lightcast, Inc (Nevada), Cross Media Corporation and cross:media Group |
| 3:2014cv00418 |
| July 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| David S. Cayer |
| Robert J. Conrad |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER granting 60 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added David Cheng for Lightcast, Inc (Alabama). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 1/4/16. (tob)
|
|
Filing
54
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 5/7/2015. (eef)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 40 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Xiyan Zhang for Lightcast, Inc (Alabama). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 11/12/2014. (jlk)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 37 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 10/07/2014. (jlk)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDERED as follows: 1) The 24 Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot; 2) The 18 Motion to Change Venue is GRANTED; 3) This case is transferred to the USDC, Western District of North Carolina pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1406(a), and the Clerk is DIRECTED to take appropriate steps to effect the transfer. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/28/2014. (wcl, ) (Entered:07/28/2014) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 7/30/2014]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
