Appelbaum v. USA
Claudia Appelbaum |
United States of America |
3:2014cv00504 |
September 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Iredell |
David S. Cayer |
Robert J. Conrad |
Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7426 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting (27) Motion to Consolidate Cases for Discovery - Trial. All further pleadings to be electronically filed to: 5:12CV186 only. Member Case: 3:14CV504 to be administratively closed. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 8/11/2015. (cbb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Appelbaum v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Claudia Appelbaum | |
Represented By: | William R. Terpening |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.