In Re: Motion to Quash Subpeona to Third Party R. Dale Fussell
R. Dale Fussell |
Nathan Shane Wolf |
3:2014mc00205 |
October 20, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
Graham Mullen |
Other Statutory Actions |
Civil Miscellaneous Case |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER granting 1 Motion to Quash Subpoena. Petitioners request for fees is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/4/2014. (tmg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: In Re: Motion to Quash Subpeona to Third Party R. Dale Fussell | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Nathan Shane Wolf | |
Represented By: | Mark Patrick Foster, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: R. Dale Fussell | |
Represented By: | Jennifer Michelle Houti |
Represented By: | Edward Theodore Hinson, Jr. |
Represented By: | Kristen Elizabeth Finlon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.