Womble v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit North Carolina Western District Womble v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

Womble v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Henry E. Womble, III
Defendant:	The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2015cv00002
Filed:	January 5, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office:	Charlotte Office
County:	Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge:	David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge:	Robert J. Conrad
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1395
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 29, 2017	Filing 42 ORDER Dedied in part and held in abeyance in part 30 SEALED MOTION (Sealed - Attorney) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Eaton Aeroquip, Inc.; (available to Eaton Aeroquip, Inc., Henry E. Womble, III), Granted in paart and held in abeyance in part 28 SEALED MOTION (Sealed - Attorney) Partial Summary Judgment (available to Henry E. Womble, III). Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 3/19/17. (ssh)
May 6, 2016	Filing 23 ORDER that all current scheduling deadlines in this matter are hereby STAYED. The parties shall file the appropriate motions for partial summary judgment by May 20, 2016. It is further ORDERED that the parties file a status report, jointly if possible, notifying the Court of the status of Defendant's administrative appeals by July 8, 2016, and every ninety (90) days thereafter until the stay is lifted or this case is closed. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 5/6/16. (mga)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 29, 2017

Filing 42 ORDER Dedied in part and held in abeyance in part 30 SEALED MOTION (Sealed - Attorney) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Eaton Aeroquip, Inc.; (available to Eaton Aeroquip, Inc., Henry E. Womble, III), Granted in paart and held in abeyance in part 28 SEALED MOTION (Sealed - Attorney) Partial Summary Judgment (available to Henry E. Womble, III). Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 3/19/17. (ssh)

May 6, 2016

Filing 23 ORDER that all current scheduling deadlines in this matter are hereby STAYED. The parties shall file the appropriate motions for partial summary judgment by May 20, 2016. It is further ORDERED that the parties file a status report, jointly if possible, notifying the Court of the status of Defendant's administrative appeals by July 8, 2016, and every ninety (90) days thereafter until the stay is lifted or this case is closed. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 5/6/16. (mga)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Womble v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry E. Womble, III
Represented By:	Michael B. Pross
Represented By:	Vernon Rollins Sumwalt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?