Calphen et al
Petitioner: Richard W. Calphen and Edna E. Calphen
Case Number: 3:2015mc00079
Filed: May 12, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Frank D. Whitney
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER striking documents 2 Amended Complaint and 1 Complaint from the record and Petitioners are ordered not to submit future frivolous filings to the Court. Additionally, the Clerk is respectfully directed to send a certified copy of this Order, along the Documents 1 and 2 in this matter, to the Clerk of Superior Court. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 5/18/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Calphen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard W. Calphen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Edna E. Calphen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?