Adams v. Berryhill
| Tony Bernard Adams |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 3:2017cv00527 |
| September 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Gaston |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER granting #19 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 11/6/2018. (brl)
|
| Filing 20 MEMORANDUM in Support re #19 MOTION for Attorney Fees under EAJA by Tony Bernard Adams. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Counsel Time, #2 Exhibit time record, #3 Exhibit Fee Agreement, #4 Proposed Order)(Clauson, Vaughn) |
| Filing 19 MOTION for Attorney Fees under EAJA by Tony Bernard Adams. Responses due by 11/8/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail (Clauson, Vaughn) |
| Filing 18 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 08/21/2018. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (brl) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying Commissioner's #14 Motion for Summary Judgment. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case is hereby REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 08/21/2018. (brl)
|
| Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #14 MOTION for Summary Judgment - Social Security , #11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Tony Bernard Adams. (Clauson, Vaughn) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Support re #14 MOTION for Summary Judgment - Social Security by Nancy A. Berryhill. (Rigney, Amy) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment - Social Security by Nancy A. Berryhill. Responses due by 5/7/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail (Rigney, Amy) |
| Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Govt's Motion for Summary Judgment by Nancy A. Berryhill. Responses due by 3/15/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rigney, Amy) |
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to file SS Brief Government SS Motion for Summary Judgment due by 4/23/2018. Text of Order: The Defendant's Motion is GRANTED, and the Defendant shall have through and include April 23, 2018 to file a motion for summary judgment. So Ordered. Entered by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 3/1/18. (LMR)
|
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Tony Bernard Adams. (Clauson, Vaughn) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Tony Bernard Adams. Responses due by 1/22/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail (Clauson, Vaughn) |
| TEXT-ONLY Social Security Scheduling Order. It Appearing to the Court that the defendant Commissioner has answered and filed transcripts herein, that the issues are ripe for this Court's Review. (Click on this link to obtain the #Social Security Briefing Order) . (Plaintiff shall be permitted one response within 14 days after the filing of Commissioner's Motion) Plaintiff SS Motion for Summary Judgment due by 1/8/2018. Government SS Motion for Summary Judgment due by 3/7/2018. (brl) |
| Filing 10 Administrative Record - Social Security Transcript (Attachments: #1 Certified Administrative Transcript)(Rigney, Amy) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Nancy A. Berryhill.(Rigney, Amy) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy Rigney on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Rigney, Amy) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney General served on 9/19/2017. (Attachments: #1 Certified Return Receipt)(ams) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Nancy A. Berryhill served on 9/14/2017. (Attachments: #1 Certified Return Receipt)(ams) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney served on 9/12/2017, answer due 11/13/2017. (ams) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Nancy A. Berryhill, US Attorney and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM 285 - SSA, #2 USM 285 - USAO, #3 USM 285 - US Attorney General)(brl) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 9/11/2017. (brl)
|
| Case assigned to District Judge Martin Reidinger. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brl) |
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tony Bernard Adams. (Clauson, Vaughn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Tony Bernard Adams.(Clauson, Vaughn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adams v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Amy Rigney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tony Bernard Adams | |
| Represented By: | Vaughn Stephen Clauson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
