Johnson et al v. Italian Shoemakers, Inc.
Plaintiff: David A. Johnson and Alda, Inc.
Defendant: Italian Shoemakers, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2017cv00740
Filed: December 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Frank D. Whitney
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER granting 90 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Michael T. Landen for Italian Shoemakers, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez on 4/6/2023. (mek)
April 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER granting 88 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Marissa A. Reichel for Italian Shoemakers, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez on 4/6/2023. (mek)
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER - Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs counsel are jointly and severally liable for $34,789.90 in attorneys fees and expenses and are hereby ordered to pay the awarded attorneys fees and expenses to Defendant within thirty (30) days of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/14/2018. (jaw)
November 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER re:Defendants Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 20) and Filing of Accounting (Doc. No. 77). Defendant is hereby instructed to submit to the Court, via email, unredacted invoices consistent with this Courts October 31, 2018 Order for in camera inspection by Monday, November 12, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/7/18. (clc)
October 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER denying without prejudice 44 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 46 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 48 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 50 Motion in Limine; denying without pr ejudice 52 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 54 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 56 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 58 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 60 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 62 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 64 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 66 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 68 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 70 Motion in Limine. Motions in l imine are hereby due on December 31, 2018, and all responses are due on January 3, 2019. The Court further instructs Parties to refile their motions in one motion, subject to the word limit in this Courts Standing Order. All pretrial submissions are to be submitted by December 7, 2018 consistent with this Courts ruling in open court and this Courts Standing Order. This matter is hereby continuedto the January trial term. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/31/18. (clc)
October 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER and Notice of Hearing - Evidentiary Hearing set for 10/31/2018 11:00 AM in Courtroom, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/24/2018. (jaw)
October 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER Granting 20 Motion for Sanctions; Affirming 24 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Court orders Plaintiffs to produce all discovery requests by the close of business on October 24, 2018. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/22/2018. (jaw)
October 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/18/2018. (jaw)
September 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER denying 25 Motion to Set Aside. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 9/17/18. (tob)
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Compel. Plaintiffs objections to Interrogatories No. 8, 14, and 15, and Requests for Production No. 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19 and 22 are OVERRULED. Plaintiffs shall produce complete responses without objection to each of these discovery requests. Within five days of this Order, Plaintiffs shall produce all discovery responses ORDERED above. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 8/9/18. (tob)
May 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 5/10/18. (tob)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson et al v. Italian Shoemakers, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David A. Johnson
Represented By: William Lawrence Sitton, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alda, Inc.
Represented By: William Lawrence Sitton, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Italian Shoemakers, Inc.
Represented By: Rendi Lynn Mann-Stadt
Represented By: Hayley R. Wells
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?