Underwood v. Harkleroad, et al
| 5:2004cv00193 |
| November 30, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Statesville Office |
| Graham Mullen |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER finding that all of petr's claims have been necessarily adjudicated and denied on the merits by the Fourth Circuit's opinion. Accordingly, the Court directs that this case be closed. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 3/28/2014. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER to appear for status conference, ( Status Conference set for 12/4/2013 @ 11:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Senior Judge Graham Mullen.). Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 11/21/2013. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting 30 Motion to Stay; execution of Court's order of 12/23/2009 shall be stayed in its entirety pending resolution of Respondent's appeal; a Certificate of Appealability is granted. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 1/19/2010. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
28
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Petitioner against Respondent (bsw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Underwood v. Harkleroad, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
