Johnson v. Thomas et al
| Robert Johnson |
| Nicki Triplett, Chad Slagle, Len D. Hagaman, Dee Dee Rominger, Patricia Thomas and Beth Berry |
| 5:2014de00117 |
| July 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Statesville Office |
| Watauga |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER granting 2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs for the limited purpose of this initial review of his complaint. Plaintiff's complaint 1 is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is instructed to terminate this action. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/21/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(smj)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER directing the Watauga County Jail to submit a trust account statement for Plaintiff for the 6 months preceding the filing of the Complaint re 3 Order for Prisoner Trust Account Statement from plaintiff. The Clerk is directed to mail this Order, along with a copy of the Court's 3 Order dated 8/6/14 to Watauga County Jail. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/12/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(smj)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER directing plf to submit a proposed amended complaint if he so wishes. If plf does not submit a proposed amended complaint within the allotted time, the Court will proceed with conducting an initial review of the original complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/29/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(cbb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
