Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v. Dakota Central Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc. et al
| Sprint Communications Company, L.P. |
| Dakota Central Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc., Dakota Central Telecom I, Inc., Daktel Communications, LLC, Dickey Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inter-Community Telephone Company, LLC, Midstate Communications, Inc., Midstate Telephone Company, LLC, North Dakota Telephone Company, Reservation Telephone Cooperative, Turtle Mountain Communications, Inc., United Telephone Mutual Aid Corporation and Polar Telcom, Inc. |
| 4:2014cv00065 |
| June 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of North Dakota |
| Northwestern Office |
| Foster |
| Daniel L. Hovland |
| Charles S. Miller |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 5/4/2015 at 10:30 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. By Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr.(KT)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 34 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Bret A. Dublinske; granting 35 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Brandt M. Leonard. (BG) NEF regenerated to PHV attorneys on 11/5/2014. (rm)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. granting 30 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Gerard J. Duffy. (BG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
