McNeill v. Bagley

McNeill v. Bagley

Petitioner:	Freddie McNeill, Jr.
Respondent:	Margaret Bagley
Case Number:	1:2002cv01645
Filed:	August 21, 2002
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Richland
Presiding Judge:	Lesley Wells
Nature of Suit:	Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 26, 2019	Filing 147 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons stated in the Order, this Court denies McNeill's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 137 ). The Court further certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appea l from this decision could be taken in good faith as to McNeill's seventh and twenty-seventh grounds for relief, and the Court issues a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22( b) as to those claims only. As to all remaining claims, the Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 8/26/2019. (K,K)
July 30, 2012	Filing 99 Memorandum of Opinion and Order granting Freddie McNeill, Jr.'s Motion to stay on the condition that he seeks reinstatement to this Court's active docket within 30 days of fully exhausing his state-court remedies. Signed by Judge Lesley Wells on 7/30/2012.(Related Doc # 96 ) (B,B)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 26, 2019

Filing 147 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons stated in the Order, this Court denies McNeill's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 137 ). The Court further certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appea l from this decision could be taken in good faith as to McNeill's seventh and twenty-seventh grounds for relief, and the Court issues a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22( b) as to those claims only. As to all remaining claims, the Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 8/26/2019. (K,K)

July 30, 2012

Filing 99 Memorandum of Opinion and Order granting Freddie McNeill, Jr.'s Motion to stay on the condition that he seeks reinstatement to this Court's active docket within 30 days of fully exhausing his state-court remedies. Signed by Judge Lesley Wells on 7/30/2012.(Related Doc # 96 ) (B,B)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McNeill v. Bagley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Freddie McNeill, Jr.
Represented By:	Robert A. Dixon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Margaret Bagley
Represented By:	Ashon L. McKenzie
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?