Cassano v. Bradshaw

Cassano v. Bradshaw

Petitioner:	August Cassano
Respondent:	Margaret Bradshaw
Case Number:	1:2003cv01206
Filed:	June 16, 2003
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Richland
Presiding Judge:	John R. Adams
Nature of Suit:	Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 18, 2018	Filing 146 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying August Cassano's amended petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. # 138 ) and further denies the discovery requests. A Certificate of Appealability is issued regarding claims as to Cassano's first , third, sixth (sub-claims 1 and 3), and twelfth claims for relief. As to the remaining claims, there is no basis upon which to issue a Certificate of Appealability. The Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from thi s decision could be taken in good faith as to Cassano's first, third, sixth (sub-claims 1 and 3), and twelfth claims for relief. As to all remaining claims, the Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge John R. Adams on 7/18/18. (K,C)
April 25, 2012	Filing 113 Memorandum Opinion and Order that the Court will defer ruling on Petitioner's motions to withdraw his appeals (Doc. # 106 and 108 ) until the state trial court completes its review of Petitioner's pending motion to stay and abey post-conviction proceedings pending a competency evaluation. Judge John R. Adams on 4/23/12. (K,C)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 18, 2018

Filing 146 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying August Cassano's amended petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. # 138 ) and further denies the discovery requests. A Certificate of Appealability is issued regarding claims as to Cassano's first , third, sixth (sub-claims 1 and 3), and twelfth claims for relief. As to the remaining claims, there is no basis upon which to issue a Certificate of Appealability. The Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from thi s decision could be taken in good faith as to Cassano's first, third, sixth (sub-claims 1 and 3), and twelfth claims for relief. As to all remaining claims, the Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge John R. Adams on 7/18/18. (K,C)

April 25, 2012

Filing 113 Memorandum Opinion and Order that the Court will defer ruling on Petitioner's motions to withdraw his appeals (Doc. # 106 and 108 ) until the state trial court completes its review of Petitioner's pending motion to stay and abey post-conviction proceedings pending a competency evaluation. Judge John R. Adams on 4/23/12. (K,C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cassano v. Bradshaw
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: August Cassano
Represented By:	Jeffry F. Kelleher
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Margaret Bradshaw
Represented By:	Ashon L. McKenzie
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?